Video-Based Microsurgical Education versus Stationary Basic Microsurgical Course: A Noninferiority Randomized Controlled Study

Abstract

Background Repetitive training is essential for microsurgical performance. This study aimed to compare the improvement in basic microsurgical skills using two learning methods: stationary microsurgical course with tutor supervision and self-learning based on digital instructional materials. We hypothesized that video-based training provides noninferior improvement in basic microsurgical skills.

Methods In this prospective study, 80 participants with no prior microsurgical experience were randomly divided into two groups: the control group, trained under the supervision of a microsurgical tutor, and the intervention group, where knowledge was based on commonly available online instructional videos without tutor supervision. Three blinded expert microsurgeons evaluated the improvement in basic microsurgical skills in both groups. The evaluation included an end-to-end anastomosis test using the Ten-Point Microsurgical Anastomosis Rating Scale (MARS10) and a six-stitch test on a latex glove. Statistically significant differences between groups were identified using standard noninferiority analysis, chi-square, and t-tests.

Results Seventy-seven participants completed the course. Baseline test scores did not differ significantly between groups. After the 4-day microsurgical course, both groups showed statistically significant improvement in microsurgical skills measured using the MARS10. The performed tests showed that data for self-learning using digital resources provides noninferior data for course with surpervision on the initial stage of microsurgical training (7.84; standard deviation [SD], 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.25–8.44) to (7.72; SD, 2.09; 95% CI, 7.07–8.36).

Conclusion Video-based microsurgical training on its initial step provides noninferior improvement in microsurgical skills to training with a dedicated instructor.

Keywords

microsurgery - microsurgical training - COVID-19 - online training - microvascular anastomosis

Publication History

Received: 01 September 2021

Accepted: 23 April 2022

Article published online:
23 June 2022

• References

• 1 Malik MM, Hachach-Haram N, Tahir M, Al-Musabi M, Masud D, Mohanna P-N. Acquisition of basic microsurgery skills using home-based simulation training: a randomised control study. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2017; 70 (04) 478-486
• 2 Leung CCM, Ghanem AM, Tos P, Ionac M, Froschauer S, Myers SR. Towards a global understanding and standardisation of education and training in microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2013; 40 (04) 304-311
• 3 Acland RD, Russell RC. Practice manual for microvascular surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 1990; 85 (03) 475
• 4 Singh M, Ziolkowski N, Ramachandran S, Myers SR, Ghanem AM. Development of a five-day basic microsurgery simulation training course: a cost analysis. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 213-217
• 5 Shurey S, Akelina Y, Legagneux J, Malzone G, Jiga L, Ghanem AM. The rat model in microsurgery education: classical exercises and new horizons. Arch Plast Surg 2014; 41 (03) 201-208
• 6 Ghanem A, Kearns M, Ballestín A. et al. International microsurgery simulation society (IMSS) consensus statement on the minimum standards for a basic microsurgery course, requirements for a microsurgical anastomosis global rating scale and minimum thresholds for training. Injury 2020; 51 (Suppl. 04) S126-S130
• 7 Margulies IG, Xu H, Henderson PW. Microsurgery training in the digital era: a systematic review of accessible digital resources. Ann Plast Surg 2020; 85 (04) 337-343
• 8 De Ponti R, Marazzato J, Maresca AM, Rovera F, Carcano G, Ferrario MM. Pre-graduation medical training including virtual reality during COVID-19 pandemic: a report on students' perception. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20 (01) 332
• 9 Satterwhite T, Son J, Carey J. et al. Microsurgery education in residency training: validating an online curriculum. Ann Plast Surg 2012; 68 (04) 410-414
• 10 Kim E, Singh M, Akelina Y, Shurey S, Myers SR, Ghanem AM. Effect of microvascular anastomosis technique on end product outcome in simulated training: a prospective blinded randomized controlled trial. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (07) 556-561
• 11 Stogowski P, Fliciński F, Białek J, Dąbrowski F, Piotrowski M, Mazurek T. Microsurgical Anastomosis Rating Scale (MARS10): a final product scoring system for initial microsurgical training. Plast Surg (Oakv) 2021; 29 (04) 243-249
• 12 Lascar I, Totir D, Cinca A. et al. Training program and learning curve in experimental microsurgery during the residency in plastic surgery. Microsurgery 2007; 27 (04) 263-267
• 13 Hui KCW, Zhang F, Shaw WW. et al. Learning curve of microvascular venous anastomosis: a never ending struggle?. Microsurgery 2000; 20 (01) 22-24
• 14 Pafitanis G, Cooper L, Hadjiandreou M, Ghanem A, Myers S. Microvascular anastomotic coupler application learning curve: a curriculum supporting further deliberate practice in ex-vivo simulation models. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72 (02) 203-210
• 15 Ortiz R, Sood RF, Wilkens S, Gottlieb R, Chen NC, Eberlin KR. Longitudinal microsurgery laboratory training during hand surgery fellowship. J Reconstr Microsurg 2019; 35 (09) 640-645
• 16 Paladino JR, Gasteratos K, Akelina Y, Marshall B, Papazoglou LG, Strauch RJ. The benefits of expert instruction in microsurgery courses. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 143-153
• 17 Inoue T, Tsutsumi K, Saito K, Adachi S, Tanaka S, Kunii N. Training of A3–A3 side-to-side anastomosis in a deep corridor using a box with 6.5-cm depth: technical note. Surg Neurol 2006; 66 (06) 638-641
• 18 Atlan M, Lellouch AG, Legagneux J, Chaouat M, Masquelet AC, Letourneur D. A new synthetic model for microvascular anastomosis training? A randomized comparative study between silicone and polyvinyl alcohol gelatin tubes. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (01) 182-187
• 19 Stogowski P, Białek J, Dąbrowski F, Mazurek T. Current trends in microsurgical education – review of types of training and skill assessment instruments. Chirurgia Narzadow Ruchu i Ortopedia Polska 2021; 86 (04) 1-5
• 20 Dos Reis JMC, Teixeira RKC, Santos DRD. et al. Novel porcine kidney-based microsurgery training model for developing basic to advanced microsurgical skills. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (02) 119-123
• 21 Grober ED, Hamstra SJ, Wanzel KR. et al. The educational impact of bench model fidelity on the acquisition of technical skill: the use of clinically relevant outcome measures. Ann Surg 2004; 240 (02) 374-381
• 22 Al-Bustani S, Halvorson EG. Status of microsurgical simulation training in plastic surgery: a survey of United States program directors. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 76 (06) 713-716
• 23 Evgeniou E, Walker H, Gujral S. The role of simulation in microsurgical training. J Surg Educ 2018; 75 (01) 171-181
• 24 Ghanem AM, Al Omran Y, Shatta B, Kim E, Myers S. Anastomosis Lapse Index (ALI): a validated end product assessment tool for simulation microsurgery training. J Reconstr Microsurg 2016; 32 (03) 233-241
• 25 Martin JA, Regehr G, Reznick R. et al. Objective structured assessment of technical skill (OSATS) for surgical residents. Br J Surg 1997; 84 (02) 273-278
• 26 Temple CLF, Ross DC. A new, validated instrument to evaluate competency in microsurgery: the University of Western Ontario Microsurgical Skills Acquisition/Assessment instrument [outcomes article]. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127 (01) 215-222
• 27 Stogowski P, Anuszkiewicz K. Letter to the editor: “Microsurgical suturing assessment scores: a systematic review.”. Neurosurg Rev 2022; 45 (02) 1809-1810
• 28 Grant AL, Temple-Oberle C. Utility of a validated rating scale for self-assessment in microsurgical training. J Surg Educ 2017; 74 (02) 360-364
• 29 Mishra D, Nair AG, Gandhi RA. et al. The impact of COVID-19 related lockdown on ophthalmology training programs in India - outcomes of a survey. Indian J Ophthalmol 2020; 68 (06) 999-1004
• 30 Chick RC, Clifton GT, Peace KM. et al. Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Surg Educ 2020; 77 (04) 729-732
• 31 Pasricha ND, Haq Z, Ahmad TR. et al. Remote corneal suturing wet lab: microsurgical education during the COVID-19 pandemic. J Cataract Refract Surg 2020; 46 (12) 1667-1673
• 32 El Boghdady M, Ewalds-Kvist BM, Alijani A. A review of online platforms in training and surgical education. Eur Surg 2019; 51: 41-48
• 33 Evgeniou E, Tsironi M, Riley D. Improving fellowship training in microsurgery: a threshold concepts perspective on the curricula of fellowship programs. J Reconstr Microsurg 2015; 31 (08) 579-589
• 34 Dumestre D, Yeung JK, Temple-Oberle C. Evidence-based microsurgical skills acquisition series part 2: validated assessment instruments–a systematic review. J Surg Educ 2015; 72 (01) 80-89
• 35 Chung S-B, Ryu J, Chung Y, Lee SH, Choi SK. An affordable microsurgical training system for a beginning neurosurgeon: how to realize the self-training laboratory. World Neurosurg 2017; 105: 369-374
• 36 Chai A, Crank S, Mizen K, Philip J. Low-cost model using a digital microscope for learning, practicing, and maintaining microvascular surgical skills. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2021; 59 (02) 247-248
• 37 Pafitanis G, Hadjiandreou M, Miller R. et al. The use of mobile computing devices in microsurgery. Arch Plast Surg 2019; 46 (02) 102-107
• 38 Navia A, Tejos R, Canahuate S. et al. MicrosimUC: validation of a low-cost, portable, do-it-yourself microsurgery training kit. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; (online ahead of print).
• 39 Ma J, You C, Chen H, Huang S, Ieong C. Cerebellar tonsillectomy with suboccipital decompression and duraplasty by small incision for Chiari I malformation (with syringomyelia): long term follow-up of 76 surgically treated cases. Turk Neurosurg 2012; 22 (03) 274-279
• 40 Chen J, Xun H, Abousy M, Long C, Sacks JM. No microscope? No problem: a systematic review of microscope-free microsurgery training models. J Reconstr Microsurg 2022; 38 (02) 106-114
• 41 Boecker A, Kornmann J, Xiong L. et al. A structured, microsurgical training curriculum improves the outcome in lower extremity reconstruction free flap residency training: the Ludwigshafen concept. J Reconstr Microsurg 2021; 37 (06) 492-502
• 42 Almarghoub MA. A simple and cost-effective method for practicing microsurgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019; 7 (03) e2146
• 43 Balasundaram I, Aggarwal R, Darzi LA. Development of a training curriculum for microsurgery. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2010; 48 (08) 598-606